Voir Dire

Voir Dire can be the most important part of a jury trial.

We understand that in any important jury trial a team of professionals work with the lead litigator — and we built our software for the entire team to stay in real-time communication to evaluate each juror to make the best strike decisions.

But how do litigators make these strike decisions? As you can imagine, opinions vary.

Peremptory Strikes

Some argue that voir dire is less about juror selection and more about juror de-selection. The point of a peremptory strike is to remove jurors that the litigator believes cannot be fair or impartial. When both sides remove those jurors, the jury pool is left with people both sides believe can be fair.

Written Surveys

Some believe extensive written surveys sent to jurors before they appear in court are the most effective way to identify biased jurors — giving them the chance to disclose disqualifying opinions or backgrounds without the pressure of fast-paced oral questioning. That's why JurorSearch incorporates all survey questions and answers directly into each Juror Profile.

Cause Challenges

One important strategy is to maximize the use of cause challenges to remove jurors who would otherwise consume a limited peremptory strike. If a clever litigator can get a potential juror to admit they simply cannot be fair or impartial, the judge will often strike the juror for cause — allowing the litigator to preserve a peremptory strike for later in the process.

Hardship Strikes

A juror that is almost certainly bad for a litigator's client — but who also has legitimate personal challenges that could prevent jury service — is a great candidate for a hardship strike, another type of strike that is unlimited in number. The more that court staff can surface these objections before jurors appear in person, the better for everyone.

Batson Challenges

Peremptory strikes cannot be used to discriminate against jurors for their race or gender. The landmark Batson decision by the United States Supreme Court created this law and gave rise to Batson challenges — and even Batson reconstruction hearings years after trial — to ensure peremptory strikes are free of racial or gender discrimination.

Real-Time Racial Composition Tracking

JurorSearch helps both sides keep track of the racial composition of every peremptory strike with constantly-updated statistics, surfacing whether either side is disproportionately striking jurors from one race.

Documented Strike Reasons

Litigators can enter their reason for each peremptory strike in real-time, creating a clean, clear record — so if a Batson challenge surfaces months or years later, the justification is already on file.

State-level reform: Some states are moving to eliminate peremptory strikes altogether. Arizona abolished them entirely (effective January 1, 2021) by order of its Supreme Court. California recently severely restricted their use under AB3070, rendering a strike invalid if it is motivated in any way by racial identification.

Ready to transform your voir dire process?

JurorSearch gives your entire trial team the real-time communication tools to make the best strike decisions — together.